Guest Contributor: State Law Under Proxy Access
GUEST CONTRIBUTOR POST: Frederick H. Alexander is a member of the Corporate Counseling Group of Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, which specializes in providing advice on corporate governance and transactions. He is also chair of the Council of the Corporation Law Section of the Delaware State Bar Association and co-chair of the General Review Task Force of the ABA Committee on Corporate Laws. This post is exclusive to The Conference Board Governance Center.
By Frederick H. Alexander
The final proxy access rules (the “Rules”) adopted by the SEC on Aug. 25 culminate a long struggle over whether stockholde
rs should have a right to include their own nominees in the annual proxy statement of a public company. Federal law now gives stockholders a right to require a publicly traded company to include stockholder nominees in its proxy materials for up to 25 percent of the directors. The Rules also provide “access to greater access” by allowing stockholders to put proposals into a corporation’s proxy materials that call for an even more liberal proxy access regime than the Rules themselves contemplate.
This entry will focus on a few state law implications of the new rules from the vantage point of a Delaware corporate law practitioner, rather than the policy debate or the intricate workings of the Rules, which have already been the subject of a number of excellent law firm memos. Read the rest of this entry »
- Frederick Alexander


