Aug
25
2010

Proxy Access First Reform Measure in Place

It may not be hailed as a shareholder Bill of Rights, but today’s 3-2 SEC vote on shareholder proxy access is the first significant part of the Dodd-Frank Act to be put into place long before the 2011 proxy season. (The rule changes take effect 60 days after they are posted in the Federal Register.)

The reason the SEC could act so quickly on proxy access is that it already had everything in place long before the Democrats pushed through the legislation over the summer. SEC Chair Mary Schapiro just needed the authority to act. Read the rest of this entry »

- Gary Larkin


Aug
16
2010

SEC Wants Financial Reform Comments Before Regs

For all you corporate secretaries, general counsel, directors, compensation committee chairs and anyone else involved in corporate governance, your chance to chime in on the anticipated new financial reform regulations is now. As in before the proposed rules or concept releases are even released to the public.

Following up on her commitment to get as much public comment on these historic reforms (a total of 243 rules in total for several federal agencies, including 95 for the SEC), SEC Chair Mary Schapiro announced late last month an unprecedented decision to open up the process so early.

“We recognize that the process of establishing regulations works best when all stakeholders are engaged and contribute their combined talents and experiences,” Shapiro said in a July 27  statement. “We look forward to preliminary public comments in these areas.” Read the rest of this entry »

- Gary Larkin


Jul
15
2010

SEC Wants Your Proxy Plumbing Stories

With more than 600 billion shares being voted electronically at more than 13,000 shareholder meetings every year and the growing practice of share lending and the proliferation of short selling by hedge funds, it’s no wonder the so-called “proxy plumbing” is getting “clogged.” But when you consider that shareholders are about to be granted more power than ever, the need for a more accurate and transparent proxy system becomes paramount.

It’s hard to imagine that such a complex system as the proxy voting infrastructure has been operating under rules from the 1980s. That’s the justification for the SEC’s 5-0 vote Wednesday to issue  a concept release on making changes to that system, as SEC Chair Mary Schapiro spelled out in a July 9 speech in Chicago at the annual meeting of the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals. [Read Schapiro’s prepared text and watch her comments during the July 14 SEC open meeting.] Read the rest of this entry »

- Gary Larkin


Jul
10
2010

Schapiro: SEC Ready to Tackle Proxy Voting Structure

If you take anything away from SEC Chair Mary Schapiro’s Friday speech to the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals annual meeting in Chicago, it should be this: the regulator plans to act quickly to institute the regulations behind financial reform.

In the meantime, Schapiro told a packed hotel room the SEC on Wednesday plans to vote on issuing a concept release on shareholder voting infrastructure, known by many as “proxy plumbing.” Additionally, Schapiro and her Deputy Chief of Staff Kayla Gillan explained to the hundreds of conference participants Friday that the SEC is looking to update many of the outdated forms registrants use and take another look at risk disclosure requirements. Read the rest of this entry »

- Gary Larkin


May
06
2010

Climate Change Disclosure Start of Long Standard-Setting Process

When SEC Chair Mary Schapiro and the rest of the commission issued interpretative guidance on climate change disclosure back in February, they said they were merely just “providing clarity and enhancing consistency” for rules that have existed for decades. Intended or not, the consequence of the guidance has put public companies one step closer to mandatory sustainability reporting.

If you are a director on a public company and have been skeptical about the need for sustainability reporting, specifically climate change disclosure, you may want to take a look at the latest data on who is voluntarily reporting.disclosure Read the rest of this entry »

- Gary Larkin


Mar
31
2010

Beware: SEC Fishing for Repo’s in Company 10-Ks

Whether or not you’ve heard about the tricky accounting technique Lehman Brothers allegedly used to mask huge losses before filing for bankruptcy protection in 2008, you may want to read this.

It is a so-called “Dear CFO” letter from the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance. It could be the first step the SEC may take in a deep dive into your financial statements to look at how your CFO accounted for repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions and other transactions involving the transfer of financial assets.

The letter, which went out in March to certain companies, is in response to an examiner’s report on the bankrupt Lehman Brothers. That bank allegedly used an accounting treatment called Repo 105 that has proved to be somewhat controversial. In an interview with CNBC this week reported on in CFO magazine, SEC Chair Mary Schapiro spells out the SEC’s strategy behind the letter. Read the rest of this entry »

- Gary Larkin


Dec
18
2009

SEC Wants More Concise Disclosure That is Material

The SEC has three messages for public boards and management next proxy season when it comes to disclosing policies and practices regarding executive compensation, risk and corporate governance: the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) should be used to tell their story, all disclosures should take risks into account and should have a threshold for materiality.

In so many words, SEC Chair Mary Schapiro and a majority of commissioners want disclosures, especially the CD&A, to be less voluminous, easier to read and full of content the investors can truly use. The commission is trying to instill in public companies the idea that disclosures should be treated like a “memo” to investors and not just another compliance document.

That is what I believe directors and management should take away from the SEC’s 4-1 approval Wednesday of new rules for disclosures in proxy and information statements. The proxy disclosure enhancements, which go into effect Feb. 28, 2010, would require disclosures in the proxy and financial statements on:

•    The relationship of a company’s compensation policies and practices to risk management.
•    The background and qualifications of directors and nominees.
•    Legal actions involving a company’s executive officers, directors and nominees.
•    The consideration of diversity in the process by which candidates for director are considered for nomination.
•    Board leadership structure and the board’s role in risk oversight.
•    Stock and option awards to company executives and directors.
•    Potential conflicts of interests of compensation consultants as well as the fees paid to consultants and their affiliates.

Read the rest of this entry »

- Gary Larkin


Oct
13
2009

Directors, GCs Take Note of New SEC Five-Year Strategic Plan

Directors, general counsel, C-level executives and others involved in corporate governance may want to take note of the SEC’s draft Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2010-2015. For starters, the plan of more than 70 initiatives is a lot more specific and prescriptive for its staff than the previous five-year plan in 2004 and it includes performance metrics to measure the agency’s ability to achieve its four goals.

SEC Five-Year Strategic Plan Draft

SEC Five-Year Strategic Plan Draft

The SEC is planning on issuing investor alerts and other education efforts designed to arm investors in their own first line of defense against fraud and help them understand both intermediaries and new products.

With the SEC under intense scrutiny for lax enforcement during the Bush administration highlighted by the Bernard L. Madoff Ponzi scheme, companies may want to look at Strategic Goal No. 2: Establish an Effective Regulatory Environment. Having already proposed a myriad of governance-related rules and amendments – shareholder proxy access and disclosure regulations regarding compensation policies, company leadership structure and the board’s role in risk management – the SEC under Chairman Mary Schapiro is intent on changing the way it enforces its regulations.

This is the third such five-year plan the SEC has created under the 1993 Government Performance and Results Act. If you wish to comment on the draft five-year plan, the SEC asks that you send letters to strategicplan@sec.gov by Nov. 16.

The SEC spells out its principles for securities regulation: “First, all investors should have equal access to accurate, complete and timely information about the investments they buy, sell and hold. Second, investors should be able to rely upon self-regulatory organizations, broker-dealers, investment advisers, investment companies, and other market participants to conduct investors’ securities transactions efficiently and in the investors’ best interests.”

As part of the effective regulatory environment goal, it plans on achieving three outcomes:

  • The SEC establishes and maintains a regulatory environment that promotes high-quality disclosure, financial reporting, and governance, and prevents abusive practices by registrants, financial intermediaries, and other market participants.
  • The U.S. capital markets operate in a fair, efficient, transparent, and competitive manner, fostering capital formation and useful innovation.
  • The SEC adopts and administers rules and regulations that enable market participants to understand clearly their obligations under the securities laws.

If you were thinking this SEC under Schapiro was not going to take up such  hot button issues like proxy access, risk management disclosure, separation of chair and CEO, executive compensation and international financial reporting standards, forget it.

Just look at what is listed under Outcome 2.1:

  • Improve the quality and usefulness of disclosure – Areas of focus will include disclosure about risk management, executive compensation decisions and practices, nomination of directors, board governance and discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition.
  • Strengthen proxy infrastructure.
  • Promote high-quality accounting standards – Support a single set of high-quality global accounting standards and promotion of the ongoing convergence initiatives between the FASB and the IASB.

Among the many metrics the SEC will use to measure its own progress is a survey of financial analysts and institutional investors on the quality of disclosure, the percentage of transaction dollars settled on time each year, the speed of execution of transactions in the securities markets and the length of time to respond to written requests for no-action letters, exemption applications and written interpretive requests.

By the way, the other goals for 2010-2015 plan are:

  • Foster and enforce compliance with the federal securities laws.
  • Facilitate access to the information investors need to make informed investment decisions.
  • Enhance the commission’s performance through effective alignment and management of human, information, and financial capital.

‘Doctrine of no surprises’ Not a Goal this Time

If you want to get an idea how much priorities can change at the SEC in five years, take a look at the last strategic plan in 2004. Look at what Broc Romanek of TheCorporateCounsel.net wrote back then (The SEC’s 5-Year Plan, Aug. 10, 2004). He writes that Chairman William Donaldson touted how the “new Office of Risk Assessment is leading the way to implement the ‘doctrine of no surprises.’” Guess no matter how much you try, they’ll always be surprises.

- Gary Larkin


Oct
07
2009

Reform Deferred at SEC…For Now

The “new” SEC under Chairman Mary Schapiro is certainly being extra careful about instituting meaningful investor reform measures following the financial crisis.

In the past week alone, the new chair reportedly delayed until November a full commission vote on granting shareholders easier access to the proxy ballot to replace directors so SEC staff could read through the more than 500 comment letters. Then, on Monday the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee (IAC) deferred until February a vote to recommend that the commission issue more guidance on the “applicability of Regulation FD regarding communication between companies, directors and shareowners.”

The decision on the proxy access rule (officially known as S7-10-09) did grab the headlines in the financial press (Bloomberg, Oct. 2) since it meant that there is a good chance that institutional investors, hedge funds and other shareholder groups would not be able to run effective campaigns against incumbent directors in the 2010 proxy season. In this case, maybe expediency isn’t more important than substance. Nearly four months after the SEC proposed the rule, the commission doesn’t seem to be in a position to bring it to a vote. The IAC only held its first meeting Monday, and that 18-person body was designed to advise the commission on matters concerning investors.

Of the committee’s three subcommittees – Investor Education, Investor as Purchaser and Investor as Owner – it is the latter headed by Stephen Davis (executive director of Yale University School of Management Millstein Center for Corporate Governance and Performance)  that has the biggest wish list. In addition to proxy access, the subcommittee plans to tackle majority voting, the role of proxy firms, collective actions by investors, the need for an independent chair, executive compensation and compensation consultants, and international financial reporting standards.

“Our purpose is to look at what happened over the last two years regarding the crisis and to see how the SEC is equipped to deal with this,” Davis told the IAC Monday.  While Davis’ panel understands it has a full plate, it is being careful not to act in haste on any issue.

“We decided if we acted now on majority voting, it could muddy the waters on proxy voting (access),” he said. “We really need to know what the SEC’s view is on majority voting first.”

But it was the full committee’s reluctance to even vote on the Regulation FD guidance resolution that seemed a bit troubling for investors. The failure to even vote on whether there was a consensus for such an innocuous measure could be ominous. The main reason for the guidance request were July 15 comments made by Schapiro at the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) annual conference in Sydney, Australia. She said Regulation FD does not restrict communications between companies and shareholders, but rather restricts selective disclosures of “material non-public information.”

In addition to Schapiro’s comments, another reason the subcommittee took up the issue is that general counsel are telling directors they are precluded from discussing company governance unless they discussed it with all the shareholders.  There is a belief that some public companies are using Regulation FD to avoid reaching out to shareholders.

Davis must have been a bit surprised by the committee’s actions  since he wrote in his Compliance Week column (Sept. 15-membership required) that “the investor committee may further request boilerplate guidelines that corporate and shareowner lawyers can use to ensure that director discussions with owners stay within Reg FD boundaries…There’s no reason to expect the SEC to do anything other than happily oblige. At that point, Reg FD should once and for all go away as an obstacle to talking.”

- Gary Larkin