Governance Center Blog

Apr
15
2012

Dim the Spotlight

It is common knowledge that people are not driven solely by the prospect of financial rewards. Yet, in business, motivational tools for top executives—particularly the CEO—almost singularly comprise financial incentives. In 1980, only 10 percent of the UK’s largest FTSE100 companies utilized incentive arrangements (in the form of cash and stock-based variable pay). Today, they are universally employed as a matter of best practice and variable pay accounts for approximately two-thirds of total compensation.

Widespread adoption of financial incentives has contributed to substantial pay increases, in absolute and relative terms. In the United Kingdom, the average compensation of FTSE100 CEOs climbed from £1 million in 1998 to £4 million a decade later, with the ratio of CEO pay to average employee pay nearly tripling. (The figures are, of course, higher for American executives.) The rise in top executive pay has far outstripped growth in share price and other indicators of company performance, with certain incentive arrangements proving counterproductive by encouraging excessive risk-taking and accounting manipulation. Read the rest of this entry »

Jan
06
2012

New twist to executive compensation disclosures

The web has been buzzing today about the recent agreement between Verizon Communications Inc. and the SEC. The agreement, detailed in a Wall Street Journal article, lays out the details. In short, Verizon will increase the disclosed pay for former CEO Ivan Seidenberg by $20 Million for 2009 and 2010 due to discretionary grants given to Mr. Seidenberg in 2007 and 2008. But what most people are focused on is on how to read the SEC staff position in a broader sense. Read the rest of this entry »

Oct
22
2011

Corporate Political Spending Message: Boards Should Get Handle on Process

Of all the messages coming out of The Conference Board Committee on Corporate Political Spending Symposium Thursday, there was one that resonated the most with public boards.

To put it succinctly, that message is that no matter how politically active a company may be, it is imperative that boards should make sure management has in place a process to track such expenditures, compile them and, when appropriate, disclose them. The new report from the committee, Corporate Political Spending: Policies and Practices, Accountability and Disclosure, [click here for a copy of the report] states: “…disclosure of corporate political spending in the context of the business strategies, principles and policies that guided those decisions may make a company less vulnerable to the risk of unwarranted allegations.” Read the rest of this entry »

Oct
06
2011

Worth Reading: Conflict Minerals Disclosure

By now you’ve most likely heard of the conflict minerals disclosure section in the voluminous Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. For those companies who might be affected by the new proposed SEC regulations, it’s officially time to start planning for implementation.

I issue this warning based on the fact the SEC is now six months behind schedule on issuing a final rule and the fact the agency has scheduled a roundtable on the topic Oct. 18 from 12:30 p.m.-5:15 p.m. at its Washington, D.C. headquarters. According to an SEC statement issued last week, the roundtable is designed to be a forum for various stakeholders to discuss appropriate reporting approaches for the final rule, challenges in tracking conflict minerals through the supply chain, and workable due diligence.

“We are committed to writing an effective rule as soon as possible, and the roundtable will help us do that,” said Meredith Cross, director of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance. Read the rest of this entry »

Mar
31
2011

Do New Proposed SEC Compensation Committee/Consultant Rules Go Far Enough?

After listening to SEC Commissioner Luis A. Aguilar speak during Wednesday’s open meeting where the commission in a 5-0 vote approved proposed rules for exchange listing standards related to compensation committees and compensation consultants as well as new disclosures, I was left wondering whether or not such rules will be effective.

I’m not saying the issue of independence and conflicts of interest regarding compensation committees and consultants should not be addressed by various exchanges (i.e. NYSE EuroNext, Nasdaq OMX). In fact, I’m wondering why the SEC didn’t follow the audit committee model in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Title III of SOX (Corporate Responsibility) made it mandatory for public companies to have audit committees while the SEC’s proposed Rule 10C-1 under the Dodd-Frank Act doesn’t go that far with compensation committees. Read the rest of this entry »

Jan
26
2011

Guest Contributor: Contraction of U.S. Companies Blurs Women Director ‘Magic Number’

GUEST CONTRIBUTOR POST: Elizabeth Ghaffari is the founder, president and CEO of California-based Technology Place Inc., parent company of Champion Boards – a service that fosters the design of boards with an emphasis on the advancement of top level women at major corporations and organizations. This post is exclusive to The Conference Board.

By Elizabeth Ghaffari

The historic focus on the “magic number” – the percentage share of women directors on the top company lists from Fortune , Forbes or S&P  – tends to miss the bigger picture of what’s happening to boards and corporations in general.  Women have been added to boards when firms have been able to increase the size of their boards.  Recently, companies have disappeared through mergers, acquisitions and closure; and boards have shrunk. A steady trend in the addition of new women directors “appears” to be a slight increase in that magic number.

We have failed to mention or analyze these trends, suggesting a short-sightedness and lack of strategic perspective in talking about adding diversity candidates to corporate boards.  If we don’t understand what is causing this sea change in the American economy, we are failing to address the substantive and fundamental issues at play in the marketplace. We’re just shuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic. Read the rest of this entry »

Nov
09
2010

Trade Association Contribution Disclosure at Heart of Investor/Company Post-Election Debate

The debate over how trade associations spend corporate political contributions continues to be at the center of the fight between trade associations and institutional investors even after last week’s midterm elections. A handful of institutional investors filed shareholder resolutions at several U.S. Chamber of Commerce member companies that challenge those company boards to review the policies and oversight of political expenditures specifically regarding trade associations.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Chamber released exit poll results from the Workforce Freedom Initiative that shows voters believe the expansion of labor unions, whose pension funds are among the biggest institutional investors, will negatively affect the economy. The results of the exit polls were released the day after the elections. Read the rest of this entry »

Sep
23
2010

Looks Like Say on Pay by Proxy Season 2011

Earlier this week, the SEC released its Dodd-Frank Act rulemaking schedule. It’s quite an ambitious undertaking for the next 10 months. But what I thought was telling was that it is designed to have a Say on Pay/Golden Parachutes (AKA exit package for executives) rule in place by the 2011 proxy season while holding off on related items such as compensation consultant independence disclosure, listing exchange standards on compensation committee independence and independent advisers, hedging for directors and employees disclosure, and executive compensation clawbacks until late spring/early summer.

Effective dates for some of these rules may be a different story as that usually depends on what the full SEC agrees to once the rulemaking process ends.

I must say reading the schedule on the SEC Web site was an ordeal in and of itself. But I guess with all those proposed rules, categorizing them by dates and subject was the only way to organize the schedule. What gets tricky is following the rulemaking process for one particular rule. For example, to find out when the Say on Pay final rule (AKA Shareholder Approval of Executive Compensation) is due out, you had to scroll through a couple of pages from October-December 2010 to January-March 2011.

So anyway, here is my best attempt to decipher the rulemaking schedule [with props to TheCorporateCounsel.net’s Broc Romanek and Compliance Week’s Melissa Klein Aguilar [registration required]. The section number after each rule pertains to the provision in the Dodd-Frank Act.

Executive Compensation

  • Say on Pay and Golden Parachutes [Section 951] – proposed rules by October-December 2010, final rules by January-March 2011
  • Disclosure of executive compensation pay for performance [Section 953] – proposed rules by April-July 2011
  • Disclosure regarding employee and director hedging [Section 955] – proposed rules by April-July 2011
  • Recovery of executive compensation (clawback policy) [Section 954] – proposed rules by April-July 2011

Compensation Committee and Compensation Consultant Independence

  • Listing exchange standards regarding compensation committee independence and factors affecting compensation adviser independence and disclosure rules regarding compensation consultant conflicts [Section 952] – proposed rules by October-December 2010, final rules by April-July 2011

Broker Voting

  • Definition of “other significant matters” for clarifying listing exchange standards regarding broker voting of uninstructed shares [Section 957] – proposed rules by April-July 2011
Jul
16
2010

Worth Reading … Financial Reform Thought Leadership

Now that Congress has passed the financial regulatory reform bill with the Senate’s 60-39 vote on Thursday  [See July 15 Reuters article here.], the hard work begins not only for regulators but for public companies who will try to make sense of it all.

Many boards and senior management will be looking to their counsel and outside consultants for advice on how to prepare for these changes, most of which will most likely occur in time for the 2011 proxy season. That is why I have prepared a short version of Worth Reading on some thought leadership on financial reform that doesn’t include the politicians. I found the literature both enlightening and resourceful. Read the rest of this entry »

Jun
22
2010

SEC Will Have Hands Full Once Financial Reform Passes

As the House-Senate Conference Committee gets closer to an agreement for financial regulatory reform, directors and chief executives are wondering how the voluminous legislation will affect the governance of their companies.

How the proposed law plays out in boardrooms depends on what the SEC does. According to Commissioner Troy A. Paredes, a guest speaker at an executive compensation roundtable hosted by The Conference Board’s Directors Institute and the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware Monday night, there’s most likely going to be anywhere up to 50 or 60 new rules coming out of the agency over the next six months. Read the rest of this entry »

Governance Center Blog