Governance Center Blog

Jan
30
2012

Governance Practices of IPO Companies – Is Carlyle More Mainstream Than You Thought?

A Director Note by Richard Sandler and Elizabeth Weinstein, Davis Polk & Wardell, recently published by The Conference Board examines the corporate governance practices of the top 50 IPO companies from 2009 through August 2011. A copy of the full Director Note is available here. Read the rest of this entry »

Nov
17
2011

Improving Board Diversity

Board diversity in the United States has remained relatively unchanged, despite a variety of developments affecting United States public companies, including an increased emphasis on business justifications for diversity and increased disclosure requirements related to diversity,  according to a recent Director Note entitled Revisiting Justifications for Board Diversity published by The Conference Board.   The Director Note also reports, however, that the existence of an outlined strategy for implementing a diversity initiative was an important factor in the overall success of such an initiative, according to one study.

To assist companies seeking to increase gender diversity of their boards, The Conference Board announced this week the release of an innovative scenario modeler developed by The Conference Board and Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business in partnership with The SAIS Center for Transatlantic Relations at Johns Hopkins University.  The model draws on historical data from 2,749 U.S. public companies to examine the evolution of gender diversity on U.S. corporate boards each year between 2011 and 2040. The interactive model allows users to adjust board characteristics to assess how departures from today’s prevailing corporate governance trends could accelerate or impede the progress toward greater gender parity in coming decades. Read the rest of this entry »

Oct
18
2011

Reports: Say on Pay Votes Bridging Shareholder-Director Communication Gap

Even though shareholders approved most of the executive compensation plans put up for vote in the 2011 proxy season, the tiny minority of failed say on pay votes are getting an inordinate amount of attention for a myriad of reasons.

Those reasons, which reflect an overarching problem between shareholders and companies, range from a pay-for-performance disconnect to poor pay practices to poor disclosure and pay reasonableness, according to a new study by the Council of Institutional Investors (Say on Pay: Identifying Investor Concerns). Based on its interviews with institutional shareholders who voted against say on pay proposals, Farient Advisors LLC, which was commissioned by CII to write the report, found that 92 percent gave pay-for-performance disconnect as the biggest reason for their vote. The other top reasons were poor pay practices (57 percent) and poor disclosure (35 percent). Read the rest of this entry »

Aug
05
2011

Reports: Key to Successful Corporate Philanthropy is Better Alignment to Business

Based on the economic news of the past week, it’s probably not a good time to bring up corporate philanthropy. But then again, maybe it is.

Corporate charitable giving has become an even more important part of doing business over the past five years as corporate citizenship has moved up the board agenda. With a sell-off  in the equity markets under way since last month amid the controversy over the U.S. government debt ceiling debate and sovereign debt worries overseas, many public companies may not have charitable contributions high on their to-do list.DN-V3N15-11 Cover

With that said, it is worth noting that charitable giving by corporations will most likely be flat in 2011 [See Chronicle of Philanthropy,  Corporate Giving Slow to Recover as Economy Remains Shaky, July 24]. However, according to a survey from the Chronicle, cash giving rose by 13 percent in 2010 after there was a 7.5 percent decline in 2009 during the recession. Read the rest of this entry »

Jul
22
2011

Succession Plan in Place as Governance Center Director Embarks on New Opportunity

Paul DeNicola, The Conference Board Governance Center director, is leaving to become a director of  PwC’s Center for Board Governance effective Aug. 8.

“Paul has been a real asset to The Conference Board Governance Center over the past six years and he will be missed,” said R. William Ide III, chair of the Advisory Group of the Governance Center. “We are delighted that he will continue to be involved in The Conference Board, interacting with us on behalf of PwC, which is a Founding Member and Sponsor of the Governance Center.”

Jon Spector, The Conference Board president and CEO, lauded DeNicola’s work as well.

“We’re sorry to see Paul go; he’s done a fine job leading the Governance Center,” Spector said. “He’s found a great position at a Conference Board member company and we look forward to collaborating with both Paul and with PwC in the future.”

In his six years with The Conference Board DeNicola served as Governance Center manager and associate director before becoming director in 2009.

“I am grateful for the opportunities that The Conference Board has afforded me, and am confident that the Center is well positioned to continue as a governance thought leader,” DeNicola said.

Ide will take over day-to-day leadership of the Governance Center. Barbara Blackford, retired general counsel of Superior Essex Inc. and former associate general counsel and assistant secretary at Monsanto Company, will provide additional day-to-day assistance to the Governance Center. Having been actively involved with the Governance Center for nearly 10 years, Ide is also of counsel to McKenna Long Aldridge LLP, co-heading its governance practice.

“Corporate directors and companies are being challenged as never before with vastly increased responsibility, unprecedented accountability, and changing expectations,” Ide said. “The Conference Board Governance Center has long been a leader in helping define practices to help directors and executives meet these responsibilities. As the corporate world becomes increasingly global, we are working with our members to assess programs and research that meet these new challenges.   I look forward to engaging our new leader in realizing this vision.”

Over the last few years the Governance Center has expanded its research and outreach with the introduction of the Director Notes series and the Governance Center Blog while continuing to provide leadership to the corporate governance community with a variety of tailored education programs like the Directors’ Institute that helps directors and executives meet their governing responsibilities.

Just last month DeNicola was named a Millstein Center Rising Star of Corporate Governance for 2011 and he was named to the Directorship 100 list in 2009 and 2010. In his time at The Conference Board DeNicola not only led the day-to-day operation of the Center but co-authored the Handbook on Corporate Political Activity: Emerging Corporate Governance Issues, a timely review for companies evaluating the risks and rewards of various forms of political spending as the U.S. presidential elections near.

The Governance Center serves executives and directors of leading world-class companies, influential institutional investors, and professional service providers who gather to discuss the most pressing governance matters. The Center’s mission is to promote optimal corporate governance practices for public companies that enhance performance, public trust, and market confidence. Through its Directors’ Institute, the Governance Center is a world leader in engaging directors, chairmen, and CEOs on governance issues, offering tailored educational programs as well as numerous peer-to-peer learning groups.

Apr
27
2011

Conflict Minerals Disclosure, Audit Could Open Sustainability Reporting Window

Through the use of sustainability reporting, a handful of public electronics companies are learning how the processes used in the due diligence of tracking their supply chain can help them get out in front on a little known section of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Section 1502 of Dodd-Frank will require public companies to disclose and possibly audit its manufacturing process when it is believed they may be using so-called conflict minerals from the Democratic Republic of Congo and neighboring countries. It is believed that country uses the proceeds of sales of those minerals to finance sexual and gender-based violence and exploitation in the war-ravaged nation. Under the law, the SEC is supposed to draw up rules that will require companies to conduct supply chain due diligence, third party verification and possibly audits of sources such metals as tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold. Read the rest of this entry »

Apr
19
2011

On First Read, Expect Proxy Access to be Retooled for 2012

Wouldn’t it be the ultimate irony if the shareholder proxy access rules approved by the SEC under the Dodd-Frank Act were thrown out by a federal court because they could cost companies too much money? One of the major thrusts behind proxy access over the past couple of decades was that the traditional proxy fights to replace directors has been cost prohibitive to minority shareholders who had to pay for their own ballots.

Most likely the court won’t strike down the rules entirely, but instead will ask the commission to tweak the rules to take into account its concerns about costs of implementing the rules, a major argument made by the federal court hearing the case earlier this month. Read the rest of this entry »

Mar
30
2011

Report: Communicating CSR to Stakeholders Crucial

A major component of any corporate social responsibility (CSR) program isn’t so much how a company carries out those activities but rather how it communicates it to its many stakeholders. That is one of the main messages in a new Director Notes report called What Board Members Should Know About Communicating CSR.

That message is one that resonates with earlier studies from such sources as KPMG International, which periodically produces an international survey of CSR reporting with the latest having come out in 2008. That survey, which tracked reporting trends at 2,200 companies worldwide including members of the Global Fortune 250, surmised among many things that “reporting is more than just a book, website, or data set. It is a continuous process that must involve and reflect the needs of its stakeholders.” Read the rest of this entry »

Mar
18
2011

The Conference Board Issues Poison Pill Recommendations

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery Air Products v. Airgas decision and the spate of poison pill adoptions in recent months lends credence to the theory that the anti-takeover shareholder rights plans are alive and well.DN-V3N5-11 COVER

A Director Notes report entitled Poison Pills in 2011 released by The Conference Board Governance Center yesterday addresses the issue of poison pills and offers some recommendations for corporate boards to avoid becoming a hostile takeover target. The report, co-authored by Andrew L. Bab (a partner) and Sean P. Neenan (an associate) of Debevoise & Plimpton, states that while the shareholder rights agreement is no longer prevalent, recent case law shows that properly structured poison pills can be valuable anti-takeover devices.

Among the four recommendations in the report [Read March 17 press release], Bab and Neenan write that boards should: Read the rest of this entry »

Feb
18
2011

Is CSR Finally Getting its Due in the Boardroom?

There is an acronym that has finally bubbled up to the boardroom: CSR, as in corporate social responsibility. And one of the reasons it is finally being taken seriously, or getting past the lip service phase, is that companies are discovering there is some real value behind CSR activities.

A recent Director Notes report issued by The Conference Board Governance Center (Investing in CSR to Enhance Customer Value, February 2011) determined that CSR activities have the potential to create several distinct forms of value for customers. The report, co-authored by John Peloza, a professor with Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada, and Jingzhi Shang, a Ph.D. candidate at the school, includes a review of 163 articles about the relationship between CSR activities and financial performance. Read the rest of this entry »

Governance Center Blog