<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investors, SEC Concerned About CEO Succession Planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tcbblogs.org/governance/2010/02/18/investors-sec-concerned-about-ceo-succession-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tcbblogs.org/governance/2010/02/18/investors-sec-concerned-about-ceo-succession-planning/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:20:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Szold</title>
		<link>http://tcbblogs.org/governance/2010/02/18/investors-sec-concerned-about-ceo-succession-planning/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>John Szold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tcbblogs.org/governance/?p=363#comment-748</guid>
		<description>When you consider the amount of scrutiny that takes place to ensure that physical inventories are reported accurately, an investor&#039;s understanding of the quality of leadership inventory (aka Succession Planning) is highly superficial. 
In a recent article, I pointed out some of the pitfalls.  Please see http://www.planningforsuccession.com/releases/The%20SEC%20&amp;%20Succession%20Planning.pdf
Directors need to be able to rely on objective third party evaluations to eliminate gaps in succession planning processes and outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you consider the amount of scrutiny that takes place to ensure that physical inventories are reported accurately, an investor&#8217;s understanding of the quality of leadership inventory (aka Succession Planning) is highly superficial.<br />
In a recent article, I pointed out some of the pitfalls.  Please see <a href="http://www.planningforsuccession.com/releases/The%20SEC%20&#038;%20Succession%20Planning.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.planningforsuccession.com/releases/The%20SEC%20&#038;%20Succession%20Planning.pdf</a><br />
Directors need to be able to rely on objective third party evaluations to eliminate gaps in succession planning processes and outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

